Skip to main content
20% off your first orderWELCOME20Shop now →

What is W/mK?

Thermal conductivity ratings explained: what the number means, how it is measured, and when it changes real temperatures.

What W/mK measures

Thermal conductivity is the rate at which a material transfers heat. The unit W/mK (watts per metre-kelvin) expresses how many watts of heat flow through one metre of material for every degree Celsius of temperature difference across it. For a thermal interface material, a higher W/mK value means heat moves through the compound faster, reducing the temperature gradient between a hot processor die and its heatsink.

No heatsink base and no processor die is truly flat at a microscopic level. Thermal compound fills the voids between these surfaces, replacing trapped air that would otherwise act as an insulating layer at the contact point. The compound's conductivity determines how quickly heat crosses that interface.

How W/mK is measured: ASTM D5470

The figure on a datasheet is meaningful only if you know which test produced it.

ASTM D5470 is the international standard for measuring thermal transmission properties of compressible interface materials. It tests actual interface resistance: the compound is sandwiched between two precision-machined metal plates under defined clamping pressure, and thermal resistance is measured at multiple bondline thicknesses. This captures both the material's bulk conductivity and the contact resistance at each surface, producing a result that reflects real interface conditions rather than an idealized sample measured in isolation.

All Amawi Technologies thermal interface materials are tested to ASTM D5470. Full technical datasheets are available on the downloads page.

On test method comparisons: Other methods, including hot-disk, guarded hot plate, and bulk specimen tests, measure thermal conductivity without an interface. Because they exclude contact resistance, they produce higher numbers for the same material. A product claiming 17 W/mK via a bulk test is not directly comparable to one claiming 15 W/mK via ASTM D5470. When evaluating products across brands, the test method matters as much as the number itself.

Heat flux: why modern systems demand more

Thermal conductivity becomes more critical as heat flux increases. Heat flux is the amount of power dissipated per unit of die area, measured in W/cm².

A 65W desktop CPU spread across 200mm² produces around 33 W/cm². A 200W+ CPU running through a 140mm² die produces over 140 W/cm². Modern high-performance processors have moved toward smaller die areas while TDP targets have continued to increase, producing heat flux densities that amplify every unit of thermal resistance in the path from silicon to heatsink.

At moderate heat flux, the temperature difference between a 6 W/mK and a 15 W/mK compound at a real-world bondline is 2-4°C. At the heat flux densities produced by a 200W+ CPU under sustained workload, or a high-end GPU under gaming conditions, that same conductivity difference can account for 5-10°C at the die. Each degree of reduction is additional headroom before thermal throttling engages.

From W/mK to actual degrees: a worked example

The thermal resistance of a compound layer follows a simple relationship: resistance equals layer thickness divided by conductivity times contact area. This makes the effect of W/mK on real temperatures directly calculable.

Take a realistic case: a CPU with a 150mm² die dissipating 150W through a 0.05mm (50 micrometre) compound layer. At 6 W/mK, the layer alone adds about 0.056 K/W of thermal resistance, which at 150W means roughly 8.3°C of temperature rise across the compound. At 15 W/mK, the same layer adds 0.022 K/W, or about 3.3°C. The conductivity difference alone is worth 5°C at the die in this scenario.

The same relationship explains why application technique matters as much as the rating: halving the layer thickness halves the resistance, exactly like doubling the conductivity would. A thin layer of a mid-tier compound can match a thick layer of a premium one.

Simplification note: this calculation covers the bulk resistance of the compound layer only. A real interface adds contact resistance where the compound meets the die and the heatsink surfaces, which is exactly the part ASTM D5470 testing includes and bulk test methods leave out.

Thermal conductivity reference

Amawi product values are ASTM D5470 rated. Reference material values are established material properties shown for context.

Material / Product W/mK
Copper 401
Aluminum 237
Thermal Interface Materials: ASTM D5470
Liquid Fusion Supreme Liquid Metal 128.0
Fusion Supreme Paste Thermal Paste 15.0
Fusion Supreme Pad Thermal Pad 15.0
Fusion Ultra Paste Thermal Paste 12.8
Fusion Ultra Pad Thermal Pad 12.8
Frostbite Extreme Paste Thermal Paste 8.5
Fusion Thermal Putty Thermal Putty 8.0
Frostbite Extreme Pad Thermal Pad 8.0
Frostbite Paste Thermal Paste 6.0
Frostbite Pad Thermal Pad 6.0
Frostbite Thermal Putty Thermal Putty 6.0
Air gap (no TIM) 0.025

Thermal pads: why thickness beats the rating

For thermal pads, W/mK is only half the story. Pads bridge gaps of 0.5mm to 3mm, ten to sixty times thicker than a paste bondline, and thermal resistance scales with thickness divided by conductivity. The result is counterintuitive: a 0.5mm pad rated at 6 W/mK has less than half the thermal resistance of a 1.5mm pad rated at 8 W/mK, despite the lower number on the label.

The practical rule when selecting thermal pads: measure the actual gap and choose the thinnest pad that still makes full contact under mounting pressure. Only after thickness is fixed does the W/mK rating decide the remaining performance, and at 1mm and above it matters far more per point than it does for paste. This is why VRM and memory cooling, where gaps are large and fixed, benefits most from high-conductivity pads.

Where high W/mK makes the biggest difference

High thermal conductivity delivers its greatest benefit where heat flux is highest and thermal headroom is narrowest.

GPU repaste

Modern discrete GPUs dissipate 300-600W across compact die areas, producing some of the highest heat flux densities in consumer hardware. Real-world repaste results on high-end graphics cards have documented GPU temperature reductions of 6-7°C and hotspot improvements of up to 14°C after replacing factory paste with premium compound. At GPU hotspot temperatures, each degree preserved directly extends sustained performance before the card throttles.

High-TDP desktop CPUs (150W and above)

Flagship desktop CPUs from Intel and AMD running sustained workloads above 150W sit at heat flux densities where paste quality produces measurable, repeatable temperature differences. Premium compound against standard alternatives consistently shows 5-10°C improvement in extended benchmarks at this TDP range, translating directly to more headroom for sustained boost.

Laptop and console repaste

Mobile CPUs and APUs are thermally constrained by design: small die, high sustained TDP, and a throttle margin of as little as 5-10°C. Premium paste reduces die temperature and pushes the throttle threshold further away. In many cases this determines whether a system holds full boost clock speeds or drops during extended gaming or rendering sessions.

Delidded CPUs (direct die)

Removing the integrated heat spreader places the paste in direct contact with silicon, eliminating the internal TIM layer. In this configuration the external paste becomes the primary variable in the thermal path, and performance differences between product tiers are most pronounced. A high-conductivity compound delivers its full rated benefit here.

Overclocking

Higher frequencies generate more heat. The margin between stable operation and thermal shutdown narrows as clocks increase. Premium paste extends this margin, enabling higher sustained frequencies without additional cooling hardware investment.

Reading a datasheet: W/mK red flags

Because W/mK is the headline number, it is also the most manipulated one. Three patterns are worth checking before you trust a rating:

  • 1.

    No test method named. A conductivity claim without a named standard is unverifiable. If neither the listing nor the datasheet says how the value was measured, treat it as a marketing figure, not a specification.

  • 2.

    Bulk values presented as interface performance. Hot-disk and bulk specimen tests exclude contact resistance and systematically produce higher numbers than ASTM D5470 for the same material. A bulk 17 W/mK and an interface-tested 15 W/mK are not the same class of claim.

  • 3.

    Ratings out of proportion to price and formulation. High-conductivity fillers are expensive. A paste sold for the price of a coffee claiming the conductivity of premium silver- or aluminium-filled formulations warrants skepticism; independent tests of such products regularly measure a fraction of the printed value.

Every Amawi Technologies product states its ASTM D5470 result and publishes a full datasheet on the downloads page, so the number you compare is the number the material actually delivers as an interface.

Application: reaching the rated spec

Thermal conductivity is a property of the material. Reaching the rated value requires correct application: a thin, even layer across the full die surface, with no excess that unnecessarily increases bondline thickness. Every additional micrometre of bondline adds thermal resistance regardless of the compound's W/mK rating.

Clean surfaces are equally important. Oils, residues, and traces of old compound at the interface add contact resistance directly on top of the new material. Both die and heatsink surfaces should be cleaned with 99.9% isopropyl alcohol before applying fresh compound.

Longevity: premium compound over time

Thermal compounds are not permanent. Every thermal cycle stresses the interface between compound and surface. Lower-quality formulations, including some that claim high W/mK ratings via non-interface test methods, are prone to pump-out, dry-out, and phase separation after 50-100 thermal cycles. The result is steadily increasing thermal resistance over 18-24 months as the compound degrades in place.

Premium compounds use stable polymer matrices and fine particle distributions engineered to maintain their thermal properties through years of cycling. A correctly applied, quality installation lasts 3-5 years before replacement becomes worthwhile.

Frequently asked questions

Is a higher W/mK always better?

Within the same test method, yes: a higher thermal conductivity moves heat through the compound faster. In practice two things limit the benefit. First, ratings from different test methods are not comparable; a bulk-test figure will always look higher than an ASTM D5470 interface figure for the same material. Second, application quality dominates at some point: a 15 W/mK paste applied too thick can perform worse than a 6 W/mK paste applied correctly.

What W/mK rating do I need for a CPU or GPU?

For office PCs and mainstream builds under moderate load, 6 W/mK provides more cooling capability than the system can use. For gaming systems and CPUs running sustained loads above 150W, 8 to 13 W/mK adds measurable headroom. For flagship CPUs, 300W+ GPUs, overclocking, and direct-die cooling, a 15 W/mK compound delivers the largest gains because heat flux is highest there.

Why does a cheap paste claiming 16 W/mK perform worse than a branded 8.5 W/mK paste?

Because the two numbers usually come from different tests, or the higher one comes from no test at all. Bulk measurement methods exclude contact resistance and produce systematically higher figures, and some marketplace listings simply print an invented value. An honest ASTM D5470 rating measures the material as an actual interface under pressure, which is the condition inside your PC. Always compare test methods, not just the printed number.

Does W/mK matter more for thermal pads or paste?

For pads. A paste layer is roughly 0.02 to 0.1mm thick, while pads span 0.5 to 3mm. Thermal resistance grows with thickness divided by conductivity, so every extra millimetre multiplies the effect of the W/mK rating. This also means the thinnest pad that still bridges the gap outperforms a thicker pad with a higher rating: a 0.5mm pad at 6 W/mK has less than half the thermal resistance of a 1.5mm pad at 8 W/mK.

Does applying more paste improve cooling?

No. The compound only needs to fill microscopic surface roughness; every additional micrometre of layer thickness adds thermal resistance. The mounting pressure of the cooler squeezes out most excess, but a heavy application still leaves a thicker bondline than a correct one. A thin, even layer that just covers the die is the optimum.

Product datasheets and technical documentation

All Amawi Technologies datasheets include full ASTM D5470 specification data for every product in the range.

View Downloads